Rapstation
Inside the Rhyme
Today in Hip Hop
Rapstation TV
Digital Affairs
MP3Jamz
Boards
Tools
Hype

Rapstation Radio

Rapstation Artists
Artist Login Artist Signup


Site Search



Today in Hip Hop Archive


Talk about it in the Forums
Rapstation.com Forum

Daveyd.com

Today in Hip Hop

Banned from Napster

10 May, 2000

Hello Rapstation:

I was banned from napster this morning by Metallica and yet the only Metallica song I had on my drive ever was a two-minute bootleg of one of their rehearsals and they are playing an oasis song as a joke.

But, much more important than that song or the hundreds of others were my songs that resided in my public folder. I am a writer and poet who has been using digital technology to record my own songs and compress them into mp3 files to distribute. I also find old spoken word recordings and match them with 78rpm beats. For example, I chopped together Kerouac, Lenny Bruce, and Bukowski with a piano sample from Patti Smith's song Birdland and called it kerouac vs lenny bruce. Kerouac gets searched a lot on napster so my track was downloaded many times. I was spreading my music across the globe. Also, since the name I use for these recordings is big80blues.com my URL is carried along with my tracks.

So my art lives because it is experienced by anyone, I am not reliant on agents or record companies. I was free to distribute to a huge and avid community of 9 million. My reward for giving away my music was that it lives with strangers. I even get fan mail from people who enjoy my site enough to tell me why. I keep track of when and who download my content. Several a day and just this morning I noticed someone downloaded all my original tracks of my own lyrics and poems. But, when I logged back on I discovered Metallica had banished me for having their copyrighted songs on my drive which I did not.

I grew out of Metallica in high school. They just robbed me of the modern version of the duped tape network of the early eighties. That was how Metallica was first known, through their demo traded by metalheads all over the world. They have reached superstar status and want to close the door behind them. This is not about infringement it is about a new way to communicate and share. They should not destroy something so positive because it is temporarily painful for them due to possible loss of revenue. Not all of us have work that has stagnated since the late 80's. Not all of us live off a musical soul that died on a North European highway. Some us live in this time and must use computers to communicate. Not all of have lawyers to manipulate us into hating a technology not even understood. The members of Metallica have repeatedly stated their ignorance of computers or on-line community and yet they are smashing the most thriving example of it. They are cutting off my ability to promote my original songs and remixes. The 9 million plus users of napster are not a threat but a message.

It feels like Metallica have crushed my ability to send my music all over the world.

New business models must be found. These nine million users are a warning that you must change to survive. Litigation will only hurt users like me. Non-users like Metallica are not losing actual revenue due to theft of property. They state in interviews they are offended that they are being stolen from, daring people to have the guts to steal from Tower Records if they want to steal their songs. A piece of plastic in a showroom is supported by the trucks that get there, the road that guided the truck to the store, the clerk underpaid from the profit of the plastic discs sale, the factories that made the plastic discs. All these people lose revenue. You would be stealing a plastic object as merchandise. Downloading from napster is access to the information of the song. Your copy is not in the real space of stereos and coffeetables. No product is stolen, it is explored, collected, and traded. This is a digital pool of music lovers who cannot afford to pay 18 dollars for a CD. The modern record industry broke the system with greed. Artists have to be superstars to survive and their superstar millions buy much more protection than anyone like me. Well a world of distribution is being created where the artist can communicate his own art instantly and without ever reaching TOWERfuckingRECORDS. All others will follow or be relics.

Metallica's move has destined them to be relics

For breaking my connection to the napster community I hate Metallica. When I was in seventh grade I was given a duped tape copy of Kill Em All and as I blasted it on my boombox and flailed about the room I would never have believed such a sound could lead to greedy actions of the status quo. I do know these self-serving bastards have all their good music behind them and they will sink out of fashion as rich sods.

angry,

unagriot