May 25, 2000
Online Music Industry Tells Congress to Leave It
Alone
By JERI CLAUSING
ASHINGTON
-- Executives from independent and online music companies asked
Congress to keep its hands off their industry while traditional
businesses and copyright interests adapt to new technologies and
controversial song-swapping services like Napster.
"Let the lawsuits play out," said Tom Silverman, the chief
executive of Tommy
Boy Records and a member of the Recording
Industry Association of America (RIAA). "The dust has to settle."
The RIAA is one of several groups that have filed copyright
infringement lawsuits against Napster, which allows computer users to
share music files in the MP3 format over the Internet.
The House
Small Business Committee called the hearing to examine how new
technologies are enabling musicians and independent music companies to
compete against the industry giants. But much of the testimony turned
to Napster and the controversy over music piracy by users of the
service.
Last week the Progressive
Policy Institute, a research group associated with the Democratic
Leadership Council, called on Congress to strengthen copyright
laws to make services like Napster illegal. Neither that group nor
representatives from the major record labels testified at the hearing.
But Silverman and other witnesses said the digital music industry
is so young, and technology is changing so fast, that new regulations
would be premature.
"We don't know if people are even going to want" services like
Napster as technology changes, Silverman said, noting that new systems
will soon let people get music through their cell phones.
Peter Harter, vice president of public policy for EMusic.com
Inc., reminded the committee that with technologies like Napster,
the songs available depend on who is online. Music files can only be
shared among Napster users who are logged on at the same time.
With services like EMusic, Harter said, computer users have
catalogs that give them "one-stop shopping." EMusic sells tracks from
independent artists that can be downloaded to computers and MP3
players for 99 cents each. The company has a record of purchases for
backups if users accidentally erase their files.
Napster, which pays no royalties to music companies or artists,
could ultimately be an "end note," as old and new companies figure out
how to make money online while also paying artists and their record
companies fairly for their music, he said.
Ric Dube, a digital entertainment analyst for Webnoize,
told Congress it is "rash to assume that every time someone downloads
an illegal music file, the recording industry has lost a sale."
"When music is free, people will try a lot they wouldn't have
otherwise," he said. "And while Napster may have enabled the worst
climate for casual piracy ever, the music industry is growing. Total
revenue is up, CD shipments are up. It's worth wondering whether free
music and MP3 swapping have stimulated sales."
At the same time, however, Dube pointed out that Napster is most
popular with young people, who have not been buying as many CDs as
other age groups in recent years.
Chuck D, a rap artist
and an outspoken critic of big music companies, applauded the new
technologies as a way to finally level the playing field for artists
and small companies.
"You'll see a change in the rules this century," he said. "I don't
think you'll see anyone go away -- you'll just see an adaptation."
The rapper, who is also the founder of Rapstation.com, said that
despite technologies that enable people to get music for free, they
will still pay to get it more easily through commercial channels.
"These big companies will still be around," he said. "I think the
laziness of the American people will keep the entertainment business
at an all-time high."
Related Sites
These sites are not part of The
New York Times on the Web, and The Times has no control over their
content or availability.
Jeri Clausing at jeri@nytimes.com welcomes your
comments and suggestions.