| Home - Yahoo! - My Yahoo! - News
Alerts - Help |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ||||
Wednesday May
24 08:25 PM EDT
Chuck D Takes the Congressional MikeChuck D grabbed the mike for an unusual audience--terminally unhip lawmakers--but politicos are listening intently to the rapper's thoughts on Internet music piracy.The Napster-MP3 debate finally hit Capitol Hill today, as musicians, execs and Internet policy wonks made their cases both for and against music-swapping on the Internet. It's a debate already raging in courtrooms and among music fans, thanks to high-profile lawsuits against Napster by Metallica and Dr. Dre. Today's arguments before the House Small Business Committee were no different: Pro-industry forces say Napster and its brethren will suck profits from artists and hobble the industry, while pro-Internet folks like Chuck D say Napster will simply keep record labels in check. Public Enemy frontman Chuck D has been a vocal proponent of the Internet revolution, launching his own site, Rapstation.com, and expounding on the wonders of MP3 song-swapping. But already, there's proof that music downloads have hurt the recording industry's business. According to a study released today by the digital rights firm Reciprocal Inc., music sales dropped considerably at stores near college campuses--where Napster is most popular, thanks to speedy network connections. Music sales were up 12 percent during the first three months of 2000, but they've dropped 4 percent at stores located within five miles of college campuses. Those retailers usually account for half of all albums bought.
Both sides, however, seem to agree that new anti-piracy laws are not needed...at least not now. But the idea has come up. A think tank called the Progressive Policy Institute is now pushing its own Internet "compromise," saying copyright laws should be changed so companies like Napster will have to collect personal information about its users. That way, judges can grant injunctions against Internet pirates more easily. It's a new idea (and probably equally scary to invasion-of-privacy watchdogs), but lawmakers say they're just trying to get a handle on the whole Napster debate. "We're still seeing what the courts are doing with the current laws," Representative James Talent (Republican-Missouri) tells the Associated Press. "What I wanted to with this hearing is law the groundwork for whatever action we may think is appropriate."
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |